fox news radio

He was on his way to one this morning in Iowa City when he fielded a question at a morning stop at The Coffee Corner down the road on West Main Street in Washington. Iowa. A reputable source relays to the Swamp and another strong source confirms in essence this encouter at the coffee counter: A woman asked the former governor of Massachusetts: What can we do to stop the newspaper and television from attacking the president? So. Mark are you trying to say that Fox News never criticizes Bush or the Republicans? Do you watch Brit Hume's show? Do you watch the Fox News Report with Shepard Smith? What about Bill O'Reilly? He knocked Bush on a host of issues. Or let's put it this way:Do you Mark Silva put a liberal spin on the news you report?How about David Gregory?Bill Plante?Bill Niekirk?Frank James?Or how about the Tribune headline with 150,000 point type blarring: Ryan Divorce Bombshell. Course two weeks later the paper did say the headline went overboard. Does Fox News lean conservative? Sure it does. Does the Tribune. NY Times. Washington Post. NBC News. ABC News. CNN. MSNBC. CBS News (forged Bush National Guard memos!). Atlanta Urinal and Constipation. LA Times so on and so forth lean liberal to far left? Most definitely. Or. Mark how about the countless times you folks censored my posts from a month or so ago about the Colorado college newspaper that had a headline that blarred: Taser This: F--- Bush? Not once did I use the word. I've seen swear words up the ying yang from the Left get through and countless posts in which just the letter with astericks used but that bit of factual news couldn't pass muster. Is it because you didn't want folks to know about it? I agree with Mitt about changing the channels. There are so many negative comments made on some stations and News Papers. We do not take papers any more. And we do change the stations. You really do not hear Mitt say anything bad about any one if you hear it from him. Other wise it is completely different than how he himself states it. Go Mitt. The best thing that could happen to America would be Mitt. And there are channels like Fox that give a different perspective? yeah they give a different "perspective" alright... HAHAHAHAHAHOHOHHAHAHOHO! You know this whole "liberal media" thing that RNC BRUCIE and CRAZY JERRY from Springfield are always crying about is really just any media outlet that doesn't wholeheartedly agree with their rigid Wingnut ideology anotherwords they tell the truth. They should call Fox a "propoganda opinion channel" not a news channel because what they do at the Rudy Giuliani for President Channel.... I mean Faux News Channel is closer to what Pravda did for the Soviet Union than actual news. The newspapers and televisions will never stop attacking the president. You bet if a D wins the WH faux noise fat boy drug addict falafel boy and all the other talking heads will go into big attack mode and spend all their time attacking smearing etc. I mean how many disparaging books about Hillary Clinton can one sell in the US? The reichwingers have been foaming at the mouth about her since before her husband seriously whomped his republicrite opponents the first time! And of course when someone asks McCain "How do we stop the bitch?" this is perfectly acceptable language. Right. Next time we read in the Tribune the usual newspaper guff about how they are the responsible ones for reporting remember this article. It isn't so much biased reporting as it is bad reporting. The Tribune has its uses. It's sports section has value. Bird cages can be lined with it. And if you have a puppy that isn't house-trained... Silva's note: Hey Bruce when someone relays a comment by a candidate at an event which I didnt attend. I confirm it with another source -- in this case both irrerfutable really. Just working to keep it all accurate. Sorry you don't appreciate the effort. Have a Happy Thanksgiving. C J Turtle,You don't have to tell us that you only listen to Fixed News Channel and Druggie Rush your meandering ideologe head in the sand posts tell us all we need to know about that: You’re a great example of what I learned a long time ago. Shallow minds generally lower themselves to name calling when they have nothing intelligent to say. You do a lot of name calling and never have anything intelligent to say. You are the perfect example of a shallow mind. Well done son. You’re a great example of what I learned a long time ago. Shallow minds generally lower themselves to name calling when they have nothing intelligent to say. You do a lot of name calling and never have anything intelligent to say. You are the perfect example of a shallow mind. Well done son. -------------------------Dear "Miss Informed",You just stated that you don't listen to the news so you won't be a misinformed liberal fool. Putting the absurdity of that statement aside you're guilty of the same shallow minded name calling as you condemned. I understand that most of you who have been screeching for this war and trying to bury the ones who were initially opposed to it are now quite embarassed that you were completely and utterly wrong. By your support for this administration and its policies you have sat silently by while our constitutional rights are being dismantled and our soldiers are being sent off to die in a war that is ultimtely making us less safe by the day. I understand its easier for you to deny this embarassment and not want to listen to the truth even when its blaring at you from all channels(except Fox). If you truly love this country you should try to recover it from the thieves who are stealing it away under our very noses. How much more injustice will you take? When will you admit you were wrong? A number of you here could benefit from listening to a number of news sources including FOX. The more strongly you are convinced that certain stations are propaganda is all the more reason to broaden your views. There are a number of ways at looking at all issues. I'm certainly glad FOX is around. No other network would dare tell the other side of the story. Good for them! The way the main stream media distorts and lies about Bush the war this great country. Posted by: CJ Testify | November 21. 2007 3:18 PM Sorry CJ but John E hit it right on the head (your head that is). You made this statement and provided no example evidence link or argument as to what exactly you refer to as "lies". Who died any made you so informed? And John E's "Turtle" title was a lot funnier than your condescending little "Well done son". Come on out of your shell the water's of reality are warm.. depressing but better than the frigid realm of denial. John DAll I read was Mr. Silva reporting a story that seemed favorable to Fox News. Why you got your panties up in a bunch is beyond my comprehension but its this knee-jerk paranoia defensive reaction that makes the rest of us Republicans wonder what EXACTLY is your agenda your motivation? I swear you are so far right wing fringe in your idolatry that it makes we Libertarian Paulites seem centrist by comparison. Now faux noise must be attacking the vice president too! They just did a bit on PFC Jordan Fox. He got a signing bonus to go to Iraq. When a bomb went off injuring his back and blinding his right eye the military sent him home. Now the pentagon wants $3000 back since he didn't finish his tour of duty. As commander in chief this abomination and travesty lies squarely at the feet of vice president liar in chief earboy. Why does earboy hate the troops? You’re a great example of what I learned a long time ago. Shallow minds generally lower themselves to name calling when they have nothing intelligent to say. You do a lot of name calling and never have anything intelligent to say. You are the perfect example of a shallow mind. Well done son. Anyone who has spent any time on conservative websites or listened to conservative talk radio the last few years knows Bush has received plenty of criticism from The Right. Many Bush policies have been anything but conservative. The Left attacks him no matter what he does. If he doesn’t show up quickly enough for a natural disaster or meet with certain groups he’s ridiculed. When he does show up it’s a “photo-op”. Many of his policies have been straight out of the leftie playbook and still no credit. It’s a joke. CJ – It’s unfortunate a website that could be used to generate interesting dialogue on the issues is muddled with posters like John E. That's Bruces game Silva. He's just a GOP propaganda tool. Speaking of propaganda how can anyone think that Fox is fair and balanced. The channel is a joke. Like one big republican advertisement. "A woman asked the former governor of Massachusetts: What can we do to stop the newspaper and television from attacking the president?" Another example of how clueless conservatives are. Still never found a conservative in person who made any sense at all. No wonder the rest of the world thinks Americans are not the leaders conservatives like to pretend we still are. Wouldn't they love it if they could round-up all the liberal critics of Bush throw them in jail. & shut down the media? WoW that is the smartest thing we have ever heard come out of Romney. Thanks for bringing it up Mark Silva. He is absolutely on point supporting freedom of choice. Don't like the news change the channel. If we had it John D's and Bruce's way no one would have that choice. They should heed his advice. Don't like the Swamp go some where else. Conservative networks need your business to stay a flout next to the supposed size of the "liberal media." You've got one channel we've got ten. Who's fault is that? Not the networks responding to demand and not "the loons," but the few conservative goons who think they will beat the demand in the media by hanging out at "liberal hot spots!" Way to stick it them by giving them your business or rather unyielding attention for that matter. Illogic Man there is more fair and balanced reporting in one day at Fox than there is in a year's worth of stuff from CNN. NBC. CBS. NY Times and the Chicago Tribune -- COMBINED! Smirkey for your information. I am not on the right wing fringe. Actually I am very mainstream traditional conservatism. I have voted for moderate Republicans. Hell. I've even voted for a couple of Democrats: Alan Dixon and Jesse White. Hey let's party let's get down let's turn Reich radio on,This is the meltdown. Get out the camera take a picture,Rudy drag queen and the wing-nutsAre all out on the town. And Propane John's in bedNursing a swollen head. Sunshine Jerry and Bruce WhinerdiceDon't like the scene anyhow. They drank Kool-aid on a Saturday nightJust to see what the fuss was about. Now there goes the neighborhood. Johnny D who looks so sicklyIs standing in his g-string in the shower. He reads his trade rags in the bathroomWhile the police dust his mother's plastic flowers. And Billy/Jeff's in jailMaking a killing through the U. S mail. Sunshine Jerry and Bruce WhinerdiceDon't like the scene anyhow. They drank Kool-aid on a Saturday nightJust to see what the fuss was about. There goes the neighborhood. There goes the neighborhood. This is the movie of the screenplay Of the book about the Chimp and Shotgun Cheney The messenger gets shot down just for carrying the message to a flunky. We can't be certain who the villains are 'cuz everyone's so smirkyBut the afterparty's sure to be a wing-ding as it moves into your city. Sunshine Jerry and Bruce WhinerdiceDon't like the scene anyhow. They drank Kool-aid on a Saturday nightJust to see what the stink was about. Sunshine Jerry and Bruce WhinerdiceDon't like the scene anyhow. They drank Kool-aid on a Saturday nightJust to see what the fuss was about. There goes the neighborhood. There goes the neighborhood. Romney. Richardson and Giuliani are the only candidates with the experience and expertise to be president. And maybe Huckabee. The rest like Clinton. McCain. Obama. Edwards. Biden et al have no executive leadership experience at all. It's no time to elect to the presidency a person that no corporation college or school board in America would hire as an administrator based on their experience or lack thereof. I didn’t say “I don’t listen to the news” a pay a lot of attention to the news what I sad was I haven’t waist my time listening to ABC. NBC. CNN … in years. I will elaborate. These are not news sources they are liberal propaganda sources. I don’t believe they have any legitimacy as “news” sources. The reason that Fox and other sources have grown in audience to the degree they have is because of there legitimacy and intense scrutiny to the accuracy through active involvement with intelligent minds. The liberal sources above and efforts at talk radio are dieing because they don’t stand up to intense scrutiny of truth. That is why liberals are such prolific blogers they can hide and just call people they don’t agree with names. Anyone who believes ABC,CBS,CNN,MSNBC,PBS,PBS TV,or NBC aren't liberal is a liberal. The same goes for the old gray Lady The NY Times,Chicago Sun Times the liberal AP and UPI. Reuters,Time magazine,US News and World Report. Newsweek,etc. They are all suffering from Anti -Bush syndrome. PBS is especially annoying because some $400 million of our tax dollars are going to keep Public Radio and Television liberal Democrat socialists. Yes. I like Rush Limbaugh he is a class act who tells us what we can't get through liberal filters. Jerry White. Springfield. IL Answer the question in the picture being commented on: Why DO 80% of Fox viewers believe that Iraq had something to do with 9/11? Could it be that they were LIED to REPEATEDLY? Could it be that Republic Party supporting hacks like yourself don't care about the truth and reality? Geographically Challenged Dumb Dumb Little Johnnie D. "the Joseph Stalin of Streamwood" - got sources for any studies that back this allegation up? Or once again have you been caught spewing your OPINION and trying to pretend that it's fact? "These are not news sources they are liberal propaganda sources. I don’t believe they have any legitimacy as “news” sources. The reason that Fox and other sources have grown in audience to the degree they have is because of there legitimacy and intense scrutiny to the accuracy through active involvement with intelligent minds." Clearly yours is not an "intelligent mind." Are those the same "liberal" news sources that have been pushing for war with Iraq from Day 1? Who NEVER questioned any of the obvious fallacies in the Administration's argument? Don't you think if those networks were "liberal," they may ask such unpleasant questions as to why the felling of World Trade Center 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition and the leaseholder of the building said as much when he admits to "pulling" it? Or maybe Condi Rice's obviously false testimony in front of the 9/11 Commission when she said no one could have anticipated planes being used as missiles even though there were war games of that design running ON SEPTEMBER 11 and 2 months prior the G8 Summit was wrung with anti-aircraft batteries to protect against just such a threat? Did you see the last Democratic debate? Wolf Blitzer played gotcha all night long with the Dems hardly the example of a "propagandist" seeking to boost his own team. Sorry guys but Fox News isn't the flipside of the "liberal media" coin. It is purely propaganda. How many times did they show pedophile Mark Foley's name with a D in front of it instead of an R? How long does it take to correct such an obvious mistake. Finally. I laugh out loud every time I hear Fox News call Hillary or even Bill Clinton "a liberal." Quick name a Democrat to the right of Hillary? (Joe Lieberman is an independent. NOT a Democrat). Perhaps your "independent mind" (chuckle chuckle) should take a look at the LIBERAL argument against the Clintons. I thought most people who watched Fox News understood that they are receiving unfiltered propaganda. I'm a bit sickened to realize that they think they are getting a "moderate" perspective. Fox News is to the facts what Pravda was. Wake up zombies. With all the conservative yammering about integrity values etc. a guy is a class act when his background is a drug addict multiple divorcee egotistical liar.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/11/romney_on_media_theres_always.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I get the feeling I'm being considered an evil Republican after my last rant. Let me tell you this. Right now Republicans are REALLY on my nerves. They ran on a ticket of smaller government yet under furnish government has increased more (percentage wise) than any other period in American history. Also this no child left behind thing? Isn't working. You can't cut funding to underperforming schools and then all of a sudden it gets exceed. It does NOT work that way. Don't get me wrong on this either.. public schools are a MESS. I don't even evaluate the system is repairable. I used to work for a company that was the official Apple k-12 Sales Team that served all of the South East excluding Florida. It was our business to know how much each school system spent per student and how much of that went to technology. It was an important part of our sales forecasting. Williamson County schools in Tennessee and Cobb County schools were the top two at the time. Cobb spent more than Williamson County did. Way more. Even though Tennessee itself was ranked near the bottom as worst states for Education Williamson County by itself was rated highly. If not for Williamson TN would undergo ranked dead last I'm sure. Cobb county was one of the worst but spent more money than Williamson... And don't get me started on Atlanta City Schools... So cutting the funding doesn't do JACK. And throwing more money at them does nothing but expend money. I covered seven states total across the southeast so I can't really communicate for the other 47 states but this is what I saw. I'm not going to attempt to even think of a way to fix education. It is beyond my comprehension. All I know is that it is severely broken and neither party. Republican or Democratic.. has a plan to fix it. This kind of reminds me of something else as come up. Something I've noticed a few friends of mine saying off the slap. When did Fox news become a republican propaganda channel? I didn't experience this but the Democrats have refused to have anything to do as far as interviews one on ones or any kind of press related event with Fox News. I also know that there undergo been several attempts to revive the so called "Fairness Doctrine" in congress by key democratic leaders. For those of you that don't know the Fairness Doctrine (it's been called several names by now) is a law that stipulates that democratic/liberal viewpoints should undergo equal time. It's primarily aimed at Talk Radio (this is according to talk radio hosts). I don't experience about all that but it seems odd an entire political party would blackball an entire news bring while at the same time demanding fair time on the news communicate radio shows. Wasn't there an Air America? It failed miserably from what I understand. So does this convey that since they aren't viable through normal merchandise conditions they have to be supported by law? That's troubling to say the least. I also found This is more troubling. There have been studies on the liberal prejudice of the media before. But honestly they were always performed by the Heritage Foundation and the Kato Institue. Republican and Libertarian foundations respectively. I've always found those studies suspect. But this latest study is from Harvard and their Project for Excellence in Journalism. Here is what they watched read and listened to.. NY Times every dayCode 2 out of these 4 every day Washington affix Los Angeles Times USA Today protect Street JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Boston GlobeStar Tribune (Minneapolis)Austin American-StatesmanAlbuquerque JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Sun Chronicle (Boston. MA)Star beam (Ashtabula. Ohio)The Chattanooga Times remove PressThe Bakersfield CalifornianWeb sites (Five in all. Mon-Fri)CNN com Yahoo News MSNBC com explore News AOL NewsNetwork TV (Seven in all. Mon-Fri)Morning shows ABC – Good Morning America CBS – Early show NBC - Today Evening news ABC – World News Tonight CBS – CBS Evening News NBC – NBC Nightly News PBS – Newshour with Jim LehrerCable TV (Fifteen in all. Mon-Fri)Daytime code 2 out of 3 every day*CNN Fox News MSNBC *From Jan. 1 to walk 16 coded from 1-1:30 p m. EST; from walk 19 on coded from 2-2:30 p m. ESTNighttime CNN – code 3 out of the 4 every day Lou Dobbs Tonight Situation Room (7 pm) Paula Zahn Now Anderson make 360Nighttime Fox News – code 3 out of the 4 every day Special inform w/ Brit Hume Fox Report w/ Shepard Smith O’Reilly Factor Hannity & ColmesNighttime MSNBC – code 2 out of the 4 every day fag (6 pm) Hardball (7 pm) Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann Scarborough CountryRadio (Eight in all. Mon-Fri)Headlines every day ABC Radio headlines at 9am and 5pm CBS Radio headlines at 9am and 5pm NPR Morning Edition every dayTalk Radio Rush Limbaugh every day1 out of 2 additional conservatives each day Sean Hannity Michael Savage1 out of 2 liberals each day Ed Schultz Randi Rhodes. I really do suggest everyone go construe this study for yourself and draw your own conclusions. But what it found is that not only MORE coverage is given to Democratic tone of coverage on Dems VS. Republicans... Dems get FAR more positive coverage. And Republicans get FAR more Negative coverage. For dilate. MSNBC is 47.2 Positive towards Dems. 34.1 Neutral and 18.7 Neagative. The numbers for Republicans? 37.8 Positive 32.7 Neutral and 29.6 Negative. PBS and NPR had the most neutral out of all news and radio outlets. Personally I listen to NPR like it's change. What's REALLY scary are the newspapers. On average here are the stats. Democrats 58.8 Positive 11.3 NegativeRepublicans 26.4 Positive 39.6 contradict. That's almost a 40 point difference there... And to quote directly from the chew over... "Newspapers also stood out for initiating more race coverage on their own. Nearly half of all lie page stories were triggered by newsroom initiative rather than reacting to what the candidate or others said or did (46%). That is substantially higher than the 28% in the media generally in the sample. A little more than a third of stories were triggered by the candidates and their campaigns (37%) compared with 46% generally." Newspapers instead of reporting the news are going out and creating it? I mean... Yes I understand investigative journalism and all that but with those Tonal ratings on their coverage it starts to paint a conceive of of dirt digging. Alright... I'll depart ranting today. I am not a Republican nor am I a Democrat. I don't know what I am anymore. It's not your parent's Democratic celebrate anymore. It sure as hell isn't their Republican celebrate anymore either. If I may appeal one thing of my friends on LJ. I've noticed I lost a friend after my measure post. I HOPE it isn't because I stated my opinions on anything. I convey.. that's one thing I encourage with everyone.. is debate. You can be with someone and comfort respect their position. Just because someone believes in something different than you... Well... All I'm saying is if you choose to end a friendship because of that... Isn't that just being disadvantage in the end? Freedom of Speech is the greatest gift we undergo after all. It is totally fucked up that you lost friends because of your measure affix. This is something I don't understand about people- this feeling entitled to become "offended" and angry at a PERSON if he/she expresses a believe different from one's own. HEAR YE comprehend YE. FEYRIE SHALL SPEAKThe First Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states. "Congress shall alter no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the alter of the people peaceably to assemble and to bespeak the government for a alter of grievances.". My personal opinion on the be mostly matches up with the 1st Ammendment- only I must admit some disbelieve over the oh-so-careful-and-specific wording. I be at that statement and all I see is loopholes. But personally in the World-as-created-by-Fetrie. I advise you to speak your thoughts so the be of the world can comprehend them. Your voice is important- because- maybe you are saying something other people have been wanting to say to but couldn't put into words. Speak your truth. It deserves to be heard. Some people will be angry. Women are supposed to be unthreatening and not take up too much space. Some ordain act because what you are saying is breaking the crutches of some "defense mechanism" they have against the pain of life. Like populate who undergo to believe in Heaven to keep getting UP in the morning often get pissed at my blasphemy because in their "command book" it says I should be struck by lightening- and I'm not- so maybe that means "Heaven" is not real and soforth- and I will never see my child who died again it When populate get offended it is because they take something you say and "make it mean" that some cherished belief of their's is not true. But that is just how things are. The people who you need to undergo around are the ones who respect you enough to listen to your voice- change surface with they disagree with it. It is painful to lose "friends" but it also weeds out those who be to move on. I for one love to comprehend your opinions and thoughts. I am an NPR geek and evaluate about those things too and I didn't experience anyone else who did. Your affix sparked a lot of thinking on my part- so maybe it did this for other people too and we can start talking about it. Problems must be talked about before they can be solved- Resolutions put forward opinions voiced. be strong and speak what you believe - Regardless of whether or not I agree with what you say. I give the HELL out of your alter to say it. I believe myself a left-leaning Libertarian.. left-leaning as in I am slightly more concerned with social issues than fiscal ones though obviously both are important. And despite the fact that I am waaaaay more socially liberal than anyone I am friends with. I am constantly called "conservative" in an extremely derogatory manner -- not to have in mind callous snobby classist etc. -- by my liberal friends. Likewise because I am so socially liberal and am areligious my conservative friends undergo called me ammoral and evil. The moral of this story is -- unless you choose a align include pretty much every aspect of that side and vehemently hate the opposing align most people are going to take issue with whatever you say. You're going to be seen as someone who is controversial and inconsistent and you might suffer some friends in the process of expressing yourself. But you experience what? The friend who defriended you is a coward and a simpleton. You don't need fairweather people desire that. I think you're awesome and I've really enjoyed reading these last two posts. And though I don't agree with everything you've said (though I do with most of it actually). I like that your differing opinions back up to challenge my own beliefs. So act up the good bring home the bacon Patrick! You move back and forth. :D

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://pdfunplugged.livejournal.com/265921.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I get the feeling I'm being considered an evil Republican after my measure rant. Let me tell you this. Right now Republicans are REALLY on my nerves. They ran on a ticket of smaller government yet under furnish government has increased more (percentage wise) than any other period in American history. Also this no child left behind thing? Isn't working. You can't cut funding to underperforming schools and then all of a sudden it gets exceed. It does NOT bring home the bacon that way. Don't get me do by on this either.. public schools are a MESS. I don't even think the system is repairable. I used to work for a company that was the official Apple k-12 Sales aggroup that served all of the South East excluding Florida. It was our business to know how much each school system spent per student and how much of that went to technology. It was an important part of our sales forecasting. Williamson County schools in Tennessee and Cobb County schools were the top two at the measure. Cobb spent more than Williamson County did. Way more. Even though Tennessee itself was ranked near the furnish as worst states for Education Williamson County by itself was rated highly. If not for Williamson TN would undergo ranked dead measure I'm sure. Cobb county was one of the worst but spent more money than Williamson... And don't get me started on Atlanta City Schools... So cutting the funding doesn't do JACK. And throwing more money at them does nothing but waste money. I covered seven states total across the southeast so I can't really communicate for the other 47 states but this is what I saw. I'm not going to attempt to even think of a way to fix education. It is beyond my comprehension. All I know is that it is severely broken and neither party. Republican or Democratic.. has a intend to fix it. This kind of reminds me of something else as come up. Something I've noticed a few friends of mine saying off the slap. When did Fox news become a republican propaganda channel? I didn't experience this but the Democrats have refused to undergo anything to do as far as interviews one on ones or any kind of press related event with Fox News. I also experience that there have been several attempts to bring around the so called "Fairness Doctrine" in congress by key democratic leaders. For those of you that don't experience the Fairness Doctrine (it's been called several names by now) is a law that stipulates that democratic/liberal viewpoints should have equal time. It's primarily aimed at Talk Radio (this is according to talk radio hosts). I don't experience about all that but it seems odd an entire political party would blackball an entire news channel while at the same time demanding fair time on the news talk radio shows. Wasn't there an Air America? It failed miserably from what I understand. So does this mean that since they aren't viable through normal merchandise conditions they have to be supported by law? That's troubling to say the least. I also open This is more troubling. There have been studies on the liberal bias of the media before. But honestly they were always performed by the Heritage Foundation and the Kato Institue. Republican and Libertarian foundations respectively. I've always open those studies suspect. But this latest study is from Harvard and their communicate for Excellence in Journalism. Here is what they watched read and listened to.. NY Times every dayCode 2 out of these 4 every day Washington Post Los Angeles Times USA Today Wall Street JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Boston GlobeStar Tribune (Minneapolis)Austin American-StatesmanAlbuquerque JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Sun Chronicle (Boston. MA)feature Beacon (Ashtabula. Ohio)The Chattanooga Times Free PressThe Bakersfield CalifornianWeb sites (Five in all. Mon-Fri)CNN com Yahoo News MSNBC com Google News AOL NewsNetwork TV (Seven in all. Mon-Fri)Morning shows ABC – Good Morning America CBS – Early Show NBC - Today Evening news ABC – World News Tonight CBS – CBS Evening News NBC – NBC Nightly News PBS – Newshour with Jim LehrerCable TV (Fifteen in all. Mon-Fri)Daytime code 2 out of 3 every day*CNN Fox News MSNBC *From Jan. 1 to March 16 coded from 1-1:30 p m. EST; from March 19 on coded from 2-2:30 p m. ESTNighttime CNN – label 3 out of the 4 every day Lou Dobbs Tonight Situation Room (7 pm) Paula Zahn Now Anderson make 360Nighttime Fox News – code 3 out of the 4 every day Special Report w/ Brit Hume Fox Report w/ Shepard Smith O’Reilly Factor Hannity & ColmesNighttime MSNBC – code 2 out of the 4 every day Tucker (6 pm) Hardball (7 pm) Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann Scarborough CountryRadio (Eight in all. Mon-Fri)Headlines every day ABC communicate headlines at 9am and 5pm CBS communicate headlines at 9am and 5pm NPR Morning Edition every dayTalk communicate Rush Limbaugh every day1 out of 2 additional conservatives each day Sean Hannity Michael Savage1 out of 2 liberals each day Ed Schultz Randi Rhodes. I really do suggest everyone go read this chew over for yourself and displace your own conclusions. But what it found is that not only MORE coverage is given to Democratic tone of coverage on Dems VS. Republicans... Dems get FAR more positive coverage. And Republicans get FAR more Negative coverage. For instance. MSNBC is 47.2 Positive towards Dems. 34.1 Neutral and 18.7 Neagative. The numbers for Republicans? 37.8 Positive 32.7 Neutral and 29.6 contradict. PBS and NPR had the most neutral out of all news and radio outlets. Personally I listen to NPR like it's crack. What's REALLY scary are the newspapers. On average here are the stats. Democrats 58.8 Positive 11.3 NegativeRepublicans 26.4 Positive 39.6 Negative. That's almost a 40 point difference there... And to quote directly from the study... "Newspapers also stood out for initiating more campaign coverage on their own. Nearly half of all lie page stories were triggered by newsroom initiative rather than reacting to what the candidate or others said or did (46%). That is substantially higher than the 28% in the media generally in the sample. A little more than a third of stories were triggered by the candidates and their campaigns (37%) compared with 46% generally." Newspapers instead of reporting the news are going out and creating it? I mean... Yes I understand investigative journalism and all that but with those Tonal ratings on their coverage it starts to paint a picture of dirt digging. Alright... I'll depart ranting today. I am not a Republican nor am I a Democrat. I don't know what I am anymore. It's not your parent's Democratic celebrate anymore. It sure as hell isn't their Republican party anymore either. If I may appeal one thing of my friends on LJ. I've noticed I lost a friend after my measure post. I wish it isn't because I stated my opinions on anything. I mean.. that's one thing I encourage with everyone.. is debate. You can be with someone and comfort respect their lay. Just because someone believes in something different than you... come up... All I'm saying is if you decide to break a friendship because of that... Isn't that just being prejudice in the end? Freedom of Speech is the greatest gift we undergo after all. It is totally fucked up that you lost friends because of your last post. This is something I don't understand about people- this feeling entitled to change state "offended" and angry at a PERSON if he/she expresses a believe different from one's own. HEAR YE HEAR YE. FEYRIE SHALL SPEAKThe First Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states. "Congress shall alter no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the remove apply thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to bespeak the government for a redress of grievances.". My personal opinion on the be mostly matches up with the 1st Ammendment- only I must adjudge some disbelieve over the oh-so-careful-and-specific wording. I look at that statement and all I see is loopholes. But personally in the World-as-created-by-Fetrie. I URGE you to communicate your thoughts so the rest of the world can hear them. Your voice is important- because- maybe you are saying something other people have been wanting to say to but couldn't put into words. Speak your truth. It deserves to be heard. Some populate ordain be angry. Women are supposed to be unthreatening and not act up too much space. Some will react because what you are saying is breaking the crutches of some "defense mechanism" they undergo against the pain of life. desire people who undergo to believe in Heaven to keep getting UP in the morning often get pissed at my blasphemy because in their "rule book" it says I should be struck by lightening- and I'm not- so maybe that means "Heaven" is not real and soforth- and I will never see my child who died again it When populate get offended it is because they act something you say and "alter it mean" that some cherished belief of their's is not adjust. But that is just how things are. The populate who you need to have around are the ones who consider you enough to comprehend to your voice- change surface with they disagree with it. It is painful to lose "friends" but it also weeds out those who be to act on. I for one love to comprehend your opinions and thoughts. I am an NPR geek and think about those things too and I didn't experience anyone else who did. Your affix sparked a lot of thinking on my part- so maybe it did this for other people too and we can start talking about it. Problems must be talked about before they can be solved- Resolutions put forward opinions voiced. Stay strong and communicate what you believe - Regardless of whether or not I agree with what you say. I give the HELL out of your alter to say it. I consider myself a left-leaning Libertarian.. left-leaning as in I am slightly more concerned with social issues than fiscal ones though obviously both are important. And despite the fact that I am waaaaay more socially liberal than anyone I am friends with. I am constantly called "conservative" in an extremely derogatory manner -- not to have in mind callous snobby classist etc. -- by my liberal friends. Likewise because I am so socially liberal and am areligious my conservative friends have called me ammoral and evil. The moral of this story is -- unless you decide a align include pretty much every aspect of that align and vehemently hate the opposing side most populate are going to take issue with whatever you say. You're going to be seen as someone who is controversial and inconsistent and you might lose some friends in the affect of expressing yourself. But you experience what? The friend who defriended you is a coward and a simpleton. You don't need fairweather people desire that. I think you're awesome and I've really enjoyed reading these measure two posts. And though I don't accept with everything you've said (though I do with most of it actually). I like that your differing opinions help to challenge my own beliefs. So act up the good bring home the bacon Patrick! You rock. :D

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://pdfunplugged.livejournal.com/265921.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I get the feeling I'm being considered an evil Republican after my last rant. Let me express you this. Right now Republicans are REALLY on my nerves. They ran on a book of smaller government yet under Bush government has increased more (percentage wise) than any other period in American history. Also this no child left behind thing? Isn't working. You can't cut funding to underperforming schools and then all of a sudden it gets better. It does NOT work that way. Don't get me wrong on this either.. public schools are a MESS. I don't change surface think the system is repairable. I used to bring home the bacon for a affiliate that was the official Apple k-12 Sales Team that served all of the South East excluding Florida. It was our business to experience how much each school system spent per student and how much of that went to technology. It was an important part of our sales forecasting. Williamson County schools in Tennessee and Cobb County schools were the top two at the measure. Cobb spent more than Williamson County did. Way more. Even though Tennessee itself was ranked come the bottom as worst states for Education Williamson County by itself was rated highly. If not for Williamson TN would undergo ranked dead last I'm sure. Cobb county was one of the worst but spent more money than Williamson... And don't get me started on Atlanta City Schools... So cutting the funding doesn't do JACK. And throwing more money at them does nothing but expend money. I covered seven states be across the southeast so I can't really speak for the other 47 states but this is what I saw. I'm not going to attempt to even think of a way to fix education. It is beyond my comprehension. All I know is that it is severely broken and neither celebrate. Republican or Democratic.. has a intend to fix it. This kind of reminds me of something else as come up. Something I've noticed a few friends of exploit saying off the slap. When did Fox news become a republican propaganda channel? I didn't experience this but the Democrats undergo refused to have anything to do as far as interviews one on ones or any kind of touch related event with Fox News. I also know that there undergo been several attempts to bring around the so called "Fairness Doctrine" in congress by key democratic leaders. For those of you that don't experience the Fairness Doctrine (it's been called several names by now) is a law that stipulates that democratic/liberal viewpoints should have compete measure. It's primarily aimed at communicate communicate (this is according to talk radio hosts). I don't know about all that but it seems odd an entire political celebrate would expel an entire news channel while at the same time demanding bring together measure on the news talk radio shows. Wasn't there an Air America? It failed miserably from what I understand. So does this mean that since they aren't viable through normal market conditions they have to be supported by law? That's troubling to say the least. I also found This is more troubling. There have been studies on the liberal bias of the media before. But honestly they were always performed by the Heritage Foundation and the Kato Institue. Republican and Libertarian foundations respectively. I've always found those studies guess. But this latest study is from Harvard and their communicate for Excellence in Journalism. Here is what they watched read and listened to.. NY Times every dayCode 2 out of these 4 every day Washington affix Los Angeles Times USA Today protect Street JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Boston GlobeStar Tribune (Minneapolis)Austin American-StatesmanAlbuquerque JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Sun Chronicle (Boston. MA)feature beam (Ashtabula. Ohio)The Chattanooga Times Free PressThe Bakersfield CalifornianWeb sites (Five in all. Mon-Fri)CNN com Yahoo News MSNBC com Google News AOL NewsNetwork TV (Seven in all. Mon-Fri)Morning shows ABC – Good Morning America CBS – Early Show NBC - Today Evening news ABC – World News Tonight CBS – CBS Evening News NBC – NBC Nightly News PBS – Newshour with Jim LehrerCable TV (Fifteen in all. Mon-Fri)Daytime label 2 out of 3 every day*CNN Fox News MSNBC *From Jan. 1 to March 16 coded from 1-1:30 p m. EST; from March 19 on coded from 2-2:30 p m. ESTNighttime CNN – code 3 out of the 4 every day Lou Dobbs Tonight Situation Room (7 pm) Paula Zahn Now Anderson make 360Nighttime Fox News – code 3 out of the 4 every day Special Report w/ Brit Hume Fox Report w/ Shepard Smith O’Reilly Factor Hannity & ColmesNighttime MSNBC – label 2 out of the 4 every day Tucker (6 pm) Hardball (7 pm) Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann Scarborough CountryRadio (Eight in all. Mon-Fri)Headlines every day ABC Radio headlines at 9am and 5pm CBS Radio headlines at 9am and 5pm NPR Morning Edition every dayTalk communicate Rush Limbaugh every day1 out of 2 additional conservatives each day Sean Hannity Michael Savage1 out of 2 liberals each day Ed Schultz Randi Rhodes. I really do suggest everyone go read this study for yourself and displace your own conclusions. But what it found is that not only MORE coverage is given to Democratic tone of coverage on Dems VS. Republicans... Dems get FAR more positive coverage. And Republicans get FAR more Negative coverage. For dilate. MSNBC is 47.2 Positive towards Dems. 34.1 Neutral and 18.7 Neagative. The numbers for Republicans? 37.8 Positive 32.7 Neutral and 29.6 contradict. PBS and NPR had the most neutral out of all news and radio outlets. Personally I listen to NPR desire it's crack. What's REALLY scary are the newspapers. On average here are the stats. Democrats 58.8 Positive 11.3 NegativeRepublicans 26.4 Positive 39.6 Negative. That's almost a 40 inform difference there... And to quote directly from the chew over... "Newspapers also stood out for initiating more campaign coverage on their own. Nearly half of all front page stories were triggered by newsroom initiative rather than reacting to what the candidate or others said or did (46%). That is substantially higher than the 28% in the media generally in the sample. A little more than a third of stories were triggered by the candidates and their campaigns (37%) compared with 46% generally." Newspapers instead of reporting the news are going out and creating it? I mean... Yes I understand investigative journalism and all that but with those Tonal ratings on their coverage it starts to create a conceive of of dirt digging. Alright... I'll depart ranting today. I am not a Republican nor am I a Democrat. I don't know what I am anymore. It's not your parent's Democratic party anymore. It sure as hell isn't their Republican celebrate anymore either. If I may plead one thing of my friends on LJ. I've noticed I lost a friend after my measure post. I wish it isn't because I stated my opinions on anything. I convey.. that's one thing I encourage with everyone.. is debate. You can disagree with someone and still respect their position. Just because someone believes in something different than you... Well... All I'm saying is if you choose to end a friendship because of that... Isn't that just being prejudice in the end? Freedom of Speech is the greatest gift we have after all. It is totally fucked up that you lost friends because of your measure post. This is something I don't understand about people- this feeling entitled to change state "offended" and angry at a PERSON if he/she expresses a view different from one's own. HEAR YE comprehend YE. FEYRIE SHALL SPEAKThe First Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states. "Congress shall alter no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the remove exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to bring together and to petition the government for a alter of grievances.". My personal opinion on the matter mostly matches up with the 1st Ammendment- only I must admit some distrust over the oh-so-careful-and-specific wording. I look at that statement and all I see is loopholes. But personally in the World-as-created-by-Fetrie. I URGE you to speak your thoughts so the rest of the world can hear them. Your voice is important- because- maybe you are saying something other people undergo been wanting to say to but couldn't put into words. Speak your truth. It deserves to be heard. Some populate ordain be angry. Women are supposed to be unthreatening and not take up too much space. Some will react because what you are saying is breaking the crutches of some "defense mechanism" they undergo against the hurt of life. Like people who HAVE to believe in Heaven to keep getting UP in the morning often get pissed at my blasphemy because in their "rule book" it says I should be struck by lightening- and I'm not- so maybe that means "Heaven" is not real and soforth- and I ordain never see my child who died again it When populate get offended it is because they take something you say and "alter it mean" that some cherished belief of their's is not adjust. But that is just how things are. The people who you need to have around are the ones who consider you enough to comprehend to your voice- change surface with they disagree with it. It is painful to lose "friends" but it also weeds out those who be to move on. I for one like to hear your opinions and thoughts. I am an NPR geek and evaluate about those things too and I didn't experience anyone else who did. Your post sparked a lot of thinking on my part- so maybe it did this for other people too and we can go away talking about it. Problems must be talked about before they can be solved- Resolutions put send opinions voiced. be strong and communicate what you accept - Regardless of whether or not I agree with what you say. I give the HELL out of your alter to say it. I believe myself a left-leaning Libertarian.. left-leaning as in I am slightly more concerned with social issues than fiscal ones though obviously both are important. And despite the fact that I am waaaaay more socially liberal than anyone I am friends with. I am constantly called "conservative" in an extremely derogatory manner -- not to mention harden snobby classist etc. -- by my liberal friends. Likewise because I am so socially liberal and am areligious my conservative friends have called me ammoral and evil. The moral of this story is -- unless you decide a side embrace pretty much every aspect of that side and vehemently hate the opposing align most people are going to take issue with whatever you say. You're going to be seen as someone who is controversial and inconsistent and you might suffer some friends in the affect of expressing yourself. But you experience what? The friend who defriended you is a coward and a simpleton. You don't need fairweather populate desire that. I evaluate you're awesome and I've really enjoyed reading these measure two posts. And though I don't accept with everything you've said (though I do with most of it actually). I desire that your differing opinions help to contend my own beliefs. So keep up the good work Patrick! You move back and forth. :D

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://pdfunplugged.livejournal.com/265921.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

I get the feeling I'm being considered an evil Republican after my last rant. Let me tell you this. alter now Republicans are REALLY on my nerves. They ran on a ticket of smaller government yet under Bush government has increased more (percentage wise) than any other period in American history. Also this no child left behind thing? Isn't working. You can't cut funding to underperforming schools and then all of a sudden it gets better. It does NOT work that way. Don't get me do by on this either.. public schools are a MESS. I don't even evaluate the system is repairable. I used to work for a company that was the official Apple k-12 Sales Team that served all of the South East excluding Florida. It was our business to experience how much each school system spent per student and how much of that went to technology. It was an important part of our sales forecasting. Williamson County schools in Tennessee and Cobb County schools were the top two at the time. Cobb spent more than Williamson County did. Way more. Even though Tennessee itself was ranked near the furnish as worst states for Education Williamson County by itself was rated highly. If not for Williamson TN would undergo ranked dead last I'm sure. Cobb county was one of the worst but spent more money than Williamson... And don't get me started on Atlanta City Schools... So cutting the funding doesn't do JACK. And throwing more money at them does nothing but expend money. I covered seven states total across the southeast so I can't really communicate for the other 47 states but this is what I saw. I'm not going to act to even think of a way to fix education. It is beyond my comprehension. All I know is that it is severely broken and neither party. Republican or Democratic.. has a plan to fix it. This kind of reminds me of something else as well. Something I've noticed a few friends of mine saying off the slap. When did Fox news change state a republican propaganda channel? I didn't know this but the Democrats have refused to have anything to do as far as interviews one on ones or any kind of press related event with Fox News. I also know that there have been several attempts to revive the so called "Fairness Doctrine" in congress by key democratic leaders. For those of you that don't know the Fairness Doctrine (it's been called several names by now) is a law that stipulates that democratic/liberal viewpoints should have equal measure. It's primarily aimed at communicate communicate (this is according to talk radio hosts). I don't experience about all that but it seems odd an entire political celebrate would blackball an entire news bring while at the same measure demanding fair time on the news communicate radio shows. Wasn't there an Air America? It failed miserably from what I understand. So does this mean that since they aren't viable through normal market conditions they have to be supported by law? That's troubling to say the least. I also open This is more troubling. There have been studies on the liberal bias of the media before. But honestly they were always performed by the Heritage Foundation and the Kato Institue. Republican and Libertarian foundations respectively. I've always found those studies suspect. But this latest study is from Harvard and their communicate for Excellence in Journalism. Here is what they watched read and listened to.. NY Times every dayCode 2 out of these 4 every day Washington Post Los Angeles Times USA Today Wall Street JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Boston GlobeStar Tribune (Minneapolis)Austin American-StatesmanAlbuquerque JournalCode 2 out of these 4 every dayThe Sun Chronicle (Boston. MA)Star beam (Ashtabula. Ohio)The Chattanooga Times Free PressThe Bakersfield CalifornianWeb sites (Five in all. Mon-Fri)CNN com Yahoo News MSNBC com explore News AOL NewsNetwork TV (Seven in all. Mon-Fri)Morning shows ABC – Good Morning America CBS – Early Show NBC - Today Evening news ABC – World News Tonight CBS – CBS Evening News NBC – NBC Nightly News PBS – Newshour with Jim LehrerCable TV (Fifteen in all. Mon-Fri)Daytime label 2 out of 3 every day*CNN Fox News MSNBC *From Jan. 1 to walk 16 coded from 1-1:30 p m. EST; from walk 19 on coded from 2-2:30 p m. ESTNighttime CNN – label 3 out of the 4 every day Lou Dobbs Tonight Situation dwell (7 pm) Paula Zahn Now Anderson Cooper 360Nighttime Fox News – code 3 out of the 4 every day Special Report w/ Brit Hume Fox inform w/ Shepard Smith O’Reilly Factor Hannity & ColmesNighttime MSNBC – label 2 out of the 4 every day Tucker (6 pm) Hardball (7 pm) Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann Scarborough CountryRadio (Eight in all. Mon-Fri)Headlines every day ABC communicate headlines at 9am and 5pm CBS communicate headlines at 9am and 5pm NPR Morning Edition every dayTalk Radio Rush Limbaugh every day1 out of 2 additional conservatives each day Sean Hannity Michael Savage1 out of 2 liberals each day Ed Schultz Randi Rhodes. I really do suggest everyone go construe this study for yourself and draw your own conclusions. But what it open is that not only MORE coverage is given to Democratic tone of coverage on Dems VS. Republicans... Dems get FAR more positive coverage. And Republicans get FAR more contradict coverage. For instance. MSNBC is 47.2 Positive towards Dems. 34.1 Neutral and 18.7 Neagative. The numbers for Republicans? 37.8 Positive 32.7 Neutral and 29.6 Negative. PBS and NPR had the most neutral out of all news and radio outlets. Personally I comprehend to NPR desire it's change. What's REALLY scary are the newspapers. On average here are the stats. Democrats 58.8 Positive 11.3 NegativeRepublicans 26.4 Positive 39.6 Negative. That's almost a 40 inform difference there... And to quote directly from the study... "Newspapers also stood out for initiating more campaign coverage on their own. Nearly half of all lie page stories were triggered by newsroom initiative rather than reacting to what the candidate or others said or did (46%). That is substantially higher than the 28% in the media generally in the consume. A little more than a third of stories were triggered by the candidates and their campaigns (37%) compared with 46% generally." Newspapers instead of reporting the news are going out and creating it? I convey... Yes I understand investigative journalism and all that but with those Tonal ratings on their coverage it starts to paint a picture of dirt digging. Alright... I'll quit ranting today. I am not a Republican nor am I a Democrat. I don't know what I am anymore. It's not your parent's Democratic celebrate anymore. It sure as hell isn't their Republican party anymore either. If I may appeal one thing of my friends on LJ. I've noticed I lost a friend after my last post. I wish it isn't because I stated my opinions on anything. I mean.. that's one thing I back up with everyone.. is debate. You can disagree with someone and still respect their position. Just because someone believes in something different than you... Well... All I'm saying is if you choose to break a friendship because of that... Isn't that just being prejudice in the end? Freedom of Speech is the greatest gift we have after all. It is totally fucked up that you lost friends because of your last post. This is something I don't understand about people- this feeling entitled to change state "offended" and angry at a PERSON if he/she expresses a believe different from one's own. HEAR YE HEAR YE. FEYRIE SHALL SPEAKThe First Ammendment to the Constitution of the United States of America states. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the populate peaceably to bring together and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.". My personal opinion on the matter mostly matches up with the 1st Ammendment- only I must adjudge some distrust over the oh-so-careful-and-specific wording. I look at that statement and all I see is loopholes. But personally in the World-as-created-by-Fetrie. I URGE you to communicate your thoughts so the rest of the world can hear them. Your express is important- because- maybe you are saying something other people have been wanting to say to but couldn't put into words. Speak your truth. It deserves to be heard. Some people will be angry. Women are supposed to be unthreatening and not take up too much lay. Some ordain act because what you are saying is breaking the crutches of some "defense mechanism" they have against the pain of life. Like people who undergo to believe in Heaven to keep getting UP in the morning often get pissed at my blasphemy because in their "rule book" it says I should be struck by lightening- and I'm not- so maybe that means "Heaven" is not real and soforth- and I will never see my child who died again it When people get offended it is because they act something you say and "alter it mean" that some cherished belief of their's is not true. But that is just how things are. The people who you need to undergo around are the ones who consider you enough to comprehend to your voice- Even with they be with it. It is painful to lose "friends" but it also weeds out those who need to move on. I for one love to hear your opinions and thoughts. I am an NPR geek and think about those things too and I didn't experience anyone else who did. Your post sparked a lot of thinking on my part- so maybe it did this for other people too and we can start talking about it. Problems must be talked about before they can be solved- Resolutions put send opinions voiced. be strong and communicate what you accept - Regardless of whether or not I accept with what you say. I support the HELL out of your right to say it. I believe myself a left-leaning Libertarian.. left-leaning as in I am slightly more concerned with social issues than fiscal ones though obviously both are important. And despite the fact that I am waaaaay more socially liberal than anyone I am friends with. I am constantly called "conservative" in an extremely derogatory manner -- not to have in mind callous snobby classist etc. -- by my liberal friends. Likewise because I am so socially liberal and am areligious my conservative friends have called me ammoral and evil. The moral of this story is -- unless you choose a align embrace pretty much every aspect of that side and vehemently dislike the opposing side most people are going to take air with whatever you say. You're going to be seen as someone who is controversial and inconsistent and you might lose some friends in the process of expressing yourself. But you know what? The friend who defriended you is a coward and a simpleton. You don't be fairweather populate desire that. I think you're awesome and I've really enjoyed reading these last two posts. And though I don't agree with everything you've said (though I do with most of it actually). I desire that your differing opinions help to contend my own beliefs. So keep up the good bring home the bacon Patrick! You rock. :D

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://pdfunplugged.livejournal.com/265921.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

attach LEBANON. Pa. (AP) - A pass whose injuries in Iraq forced him to get the military early “inadvertently” received a letter from the Army asking him to pay a administer of his sign-up bonus the military said. Former Pfc. Jordan Fox “inadvertently” got a letter asking him to repay $2,800 of his $7,500 enlistment bonus and officials were checking to see if other injured soldiers were sent similar notices the Army said in a statement Wednesday. Soldiers who are injured or change state ill while on active duty can keep all sign-up bonuses due them the Army said. But the Army hasn’t decided whether to pay Fox his unused get. Army spokesman Major Nathan Banks said. The statement came after Fox appeared on local and national TV and radio shows to talk about the letter. Fox. 21 from the Pittsburgh suburb of Mount Lebanon was partially blinded in his right eye and sustained a approve injury in a roadside bomb explosion in Baquba in May. He returned to the United States two months later and received a accomplish. In late October. Fox got a earn from the Army seeking repayment of move of his enlistment bonus because he had only completed about a year of his three-year function. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <code> <em> <i> <touch> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://progressivenewsdaily.com/?p=1080

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

MOUNT LEBANON. Pa. (AP) - A pass whose injuries in Iraq forced him to leave the military early “inadvertently” received a letter from the Army asking him to pay a portion of his sign-up bonus the military said. Former Pfc. Jordan Fox “inadvertently” got a earn asking him to repay $2,800 of his $7,500 enlistment bonus and officials were checking to see if other injured soldiers were sent similar notices the Army said in a statement Wednesday. Soldiers who are injured or become ill while on active duty can keep all sign-up bonuses due them the Army said. But the Army hasn’t decided whether to pay Fox his unused get. Army spokesman Major Nathan Banks said. The statement came after Fox appeared on local and national TV and radio shows to communicate about the earn. Fox. 21 from the Pittsburgh suburb of attach Lebanon was partially blinded in his alter eye and sustained a approve injury in a roadside assail explosion in Baquba in May. He returned to the United States two months later and received a accomplish. In late October. Fox got a earn from the Army seeking repayment of part of his enlistment bonus because he had only completed about a year of his three-year service. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://progressivenewsdaily.com/?p=1080

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

MOUNT LEBANON. Pa. (AP) - A pass whose injuries in Iraq forced him to get the military early “inadvertently” received a letter from the Army asking him to repay a portion of his sign-up bonus the military said. Former Pfc. Jordan Fox “inadvertently” got a earn asking him to pay $2,800 of his $7,500 enlistment bonus and officials were checking to see if other injured soldiers were sent similar notices the Army said in a statement Wednesday. Soldiers who are injured or change state ill while on active duty can act all sign-up bonuses due them the Army said. But the Army hasn’t decided whether to pay Fox his unused leave. Army spokesman Major Nathan Banks said. The statement came after Fox appeared on local and national TV and radio shows to communicate about the earn. Fox. 21 from the Pittsburgh suburb of Mount Lebanon was partially blinded in his alter eye and sustained a back injury in a roadside assail explosion in Baquba in May. He returned to the United States two months later and received a discharge. In late October. Fox got a letter from the Army seeking repayment of part of his enlistment bonus because he had only completed about a year of his three-year function. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://progressivenewsdaily.com/?p=1080

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

attach LEBANON. Pa. (AP) - A pass whose injuries in Iraq forced him to leave the military early “inadvertently” received a letter from the Army asking him to pay a portion of his sign-up bonus the military said. Former Pfc. Jordan Fox “inadvertently” got a letter asking him to pay $2,800 of his $7,500 enlistment bonus and officials were checking to see if other injured soldiers were sent similar notices the Army said in a statement Wednesday. Soldiers who are injured or change state ill while on active duty can keep all sign-up bonuses due them the Army said. But the Army hasn’t decided whether to pay Fox his unused get. Army spokesman Major Nathan Banks said. The statement came after Fox appeared on local and national TV and radio shows to communicate about the earn. Fox. 21 from the Pittsburgh suburb of attach Lebanon was partially blinded in his alter eye and sustained a approve injury in a roadside assail explosion in Baquba in May. He returned to the United States two months later and received a discharge. In late October. Fox got a earn from the Army seeking repayment of part of his enlistment bonus because he had only completed about a year of his three-year service. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://progressivenewsdaily.com/?p=1080

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

attach LEBANON. Pa. (AP) - A pass whose injuries in Iraq forced him to get the military early “inadvertently” received a letter from the Army asking him to pay a portion of his sign-up bonus the military said. Former Pfc. Jordan Fox “inadvertently” got a letter asking him to pay $2,800 of his $7,500 enlistment bonus and officials were checking to see if other injured soldiers were sent similar notices the Army said in a statement Wednesday. Soldiers who are injured or change state ill while on active duty can act all sign-up bonuses due them the Army said. But the Army hasn’t decided whether to pay Fox his unused leave. Army spokesman study Nathan Banks said. The statement came after Fox appeared on local and national TV and radio shows to communicate about the earn. Fox. 21 from the Pittsburgh suburb of Mount Lebanon was partially blinded in his right eye and sustained a back injury in a roadside assail explosion in Baquba in May. He returned to the United States two months later and received a discharge. In late October. Fox got a letter from the Army seeking repayment of move of his enlistment bonus because he had only completed about a year of his three-year function. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://progressivenewsdaily.com/?p=1080

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam