K-State researchers predictionMANHATTAN. KAN. -- As much as $945 million. That's what agricultural economists at Kansas express University say could be the force on Kansas' economy were there a large-scale foot-and-mouth outbreak in a region thick with livestock operations."If such an outbreak were to occur livestock and meat commerce change and movement would be halted," said Ted Schroeder a K-State professor of agricultural economics. "That represents a very very expensive endeavor."Schroeder is author of a cover that predicts a devastating economic impact should foot-and-mouth disease come to Kansas. The paper based on the dissertation of K-State agricultural economics doctoral graduate Dustin Pendell now on the faculty at Colorado State University was also co-authored by John Leatherman professor of agricultural economics at K-State. The assort's paper was recently published in a special October edition of the Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. Foot-and-mouth disease is a highly contagious viral disease that does not affect humans but can undergo devastating effects on cloven-hoofed animals such as cattle swine sheep goats and deer. The United States has not had case of foot-and-mouth disease since 1929. The team of K-State researchers analyzed a 14-county region in southwest Kansas that has a high concentration of large cattle feeding operations as come up as other livestock enterprises and beef processing plants. They considered three scenarios: one where the disease was introduced at a single cow-calf operation; one where a medium-sized feedlot. 10,000 to 20,000 continue of cattle was initially infected; and one where five large feedlots each with more than 40,000 head of cattle were simultaneously exposed. Schroeder said the first two scenarios were used to guess what could happen if the disease were introduced accidentally while the larger scenario shows what could happen were there an intentional release. Generally researchers found that the greater the number of animals infected in an operation the longer an outbreak would measure and the more it would likely spread -- all directly correlating to the aim of economic baffle. Under the small cow-calf scenario researchers predicted that 126,000 continue of livestock would undergo to be destroyed and that a foot-and-mouth disease outbreak would last 29 days. In the medium-sized operation those numbers went up to 407,000 animals and 39 days. In the scenario where five large feedlots were exposed at the same time researchers predicted that 1.7 million head of livestock would undergo to be destroyed and that an outbreak would measure nearly three months. From smallest to largest operation that translated into regional economic losses of $23 million. $140 million and $685 million respectively. For the state of Kansas as a whole those numbers climb to $36 million. $199 million and $945 million."Contagious foreign animal diseases desire foot-and-mouth are of considerable alarm," Schroeder said citing the force of globalization extensive international jaunt outbreaks in other countries and heightened concerns about bioterrorism."Kansas produces about 1.5 million calves markets 5.5 million head of fed cattle and slaughters 7.5 million continue of cattle annually. The large commercial cattle feedlot and beef packing industries together bring more than 100,000 continue of cattle per week on add up into the express for feeding or processing," Schroeder said. "Such large volumes of livestock movement provide avenues for contagious animal disease to move."Leatherman estimated the statewide impacts of foot-and-mouth for this study and said the effects of an outbreak would go way beyond producers."This study tells us what the overall stake of the region and state has in preventing such an occurrence," he said. "It isn't just farmers ranchers cater lots and packers who would experience -- it's all of us in some measure."Fred Cholick dean of K-State's College of Agriculture said that this research illustrates exactly why the National Bio and Agro-defense Facility also known as NBAF is needed in Kansas."The force of agriculture in Kansas is huge," Cholick said. "Kansas and Manhattan are literally at the heart of the industry the National Bio and Agro-defense Facility is charged with protecting. Surveillance and the development of knowledge are key today because food safety is a global air. Disease knows no borders. This reality is why NBAF is so important."Manhattan is one of five potential locations for the $451 million federal animal health lab where researchers ordain study animal disease and create countermeasures such as vaccines. To look at minimizing the impact of foot-and mouth. Schroeder and a aggroup of experts also began collaborating this fall with the U. S. Department of Agriculture to cause the economic benefits and costs associated with animal identification. Kansas State University
Smiths Detection part of the global technology business Smiths Group today announces it is to open a portable detection system that ordain alter veterinarians to displace out on-site diagnosis of animal diseases such as foot-and-mouth and avian flu. Microbiology experts ordain be gathering today. 04 March 2004 at the Hub in Edinburgh to express MSPs about the many varied ways in which microbes are involved in the everyday issues requiring Government decisions. Health environment and the economy occupy much of the work of the Scottish Parliament. These topics are often dominated by microbiology. From the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases to the production of beer cease and whisky or cleaning up pollution microbes have an important move to compete. "We be microbiologists" explains Hugh Pennington. President of the Society for General Microbiology. "It used to be said that antibiotics would alter microbiologists reMillions of animals could be needlessly slaughtered and billions of dollars lost from economies unless the world backs an international science team to develop new tools to fight foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). A group of world-leading researchers aims to create a more effective FMD vaccine and better diagnostic tests that would enable livestock disease hold back agencies to isolate and eventually eliminate the disease. The aggroup of scientists from the United Kingdom. Canada. United States and Australia are leading a call for international support for a bold five-year research communicate. "Foot-and-mouth disease is a global problem and it requires a global solution," says project leaderThe initiate for Animal Health is pleased to announce that Dr Matthew Baylis has been appointed as continue of the Division of Epidemiology. Dr Baylis ordain take charge of a re-structured division responsible for experimental epidemiology and mathematical modelling of a be of infectious diseases across the Institute's three laboratories at Compton. Edinburgh and Pirbright. Dr Baylis joined the Institute in 1993 as a postdoctoral researcher and became a research group leader in 2000. During this time he has made a significant force in the development of mathematical models to guess the spread of BSE scrapie bluetongue and African horse sickness. IAH Director Professor Paul-Pierre PastoThe UK should seek to be free of foot-and-mouth disease without using routine vaccination the Royal Society recommends in a report published today (16 July 2002). However the UK Government must make a major effort with other European Union Member States to ensure that by the end of next year emergency vaccination can be used as a primary means of preventing any future outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease from becoming an epidemic. The report was prepared by a committee appointed by the Royal Society which was commissioned by the Government last year to displace out an independent inquiry into scientific aspects of the transmission prevention and control of outbreaks of infectious diseasBritain's foot-and-mouth epidemic would have been over much sooner if the slaughter and get rid of policy currently in operation had been implemented from the beginning according to researchers at the University of Cambridge. Dr Matt Keeling. Dr Bryan Grenfell and colleagues in the Department of Zoology along with researchers in the University of Edinburgh and the Department for Environment. Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) undergo constructed a detailed model of the epidemic. They used the location of every farm in Britain as come up as the number and write of livestock to calculate the regional risk of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease. Their results have shown that the current policy of local The Institute for Animal Health (IAH) is an international centre for research into the major infectious diseases of farm animals. It is sponsored and funded by the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and undertakes research in support of the policies of the Ministry of Agriculture. Fisheries and Food (MAFF) to control animal disease. The IAH's Pirbright Laboratory was first alerted to a suspected case of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) on Monday 19th February and subsequently confirmed this diagnosis. Since then the IAH has been actively working with MAFF in its investigation of the source and extent of the FMD outbreak. The role of the IAH in the current outbreak of FMThe rationale behind the publication of the Strategic intend is the threat posed by diseases of farm animals to the well-being of every nation in terms of food animal welfare and public health. The plan highlights the vital need to keep UK expertise in the infectious diseases of farm animals given that disease is dynamic and unpredictable with a new infectious pathogen of livestock emerging on add up every two years or so.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://www.brightsurf.com/news/headlines/34473/Foot-and-mouth_disease_could_cost_Kansas_nearly_a_billion_dollars.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
